Anarcho-Techno-Super-Capitalism Pt. 4

The Market for Silver Bullets in a 5th Generation Warfare World

It would be good for readers to familiarize themselves with my previous work for drawing conclusions from my current work. I work to draw my own conclusions from my own life and experience and to share that with others.

The problem with the ‘Machines of Tomorrow’ as Nick Land describes them is that no matter how many neurons they manage to hook up to however many parallel processors, they will only ever be as good as their senses. Within the context of a mollusk or a jellyfish, the ability to mimic and imitate is easy, whereas the ability to demonstrate what it actually is to be human is not. Bitcoin changes nothing about this, and with respect to concepts such as ‘Artificial General Intelligence’ there is no wisdom gained from a kill drone killing a man just because it’s harder for the man to kill the kill drone than it is for the kill drone to kill the human. All this is is the reductio ad absurdum of the Lovecraftian Cthulu Principle and a demonstration of humans lowering themselves to the level of the prevailing technology rather than raising themselves above it with their own ingenuity and creativity.

In this way, if Bitcoin has proved anyone right in terms of how Bitcoin has evolved and emerged since 2011, it is Mark Fisher. The evolution of artificial Kantian Time, as Nick Land describes Bitcoin (Crypto-Current Bitcoin and Philosophy, Bitcoin solves the Problem of Spacetime) has only further proven how little of it we, as a human species, have in any objective sense. After having worked for the Bitcoin Association as an educator and attended the London Blockchain Conference, and having communicated all these ideas to the best of my ability with them, it’s clear that nobody in Bitcoin, and least of all the Bitcoin Association, really understands the nature of the currency in which they are really trying to deal, which is time.

I already wrote about this, and after having worked at the Bitcoin Association as an educator, having been hired for producing material such as that below, it’s sad that this is still the case, that nothing was really learned.

Having this Cyberspace Time Machine allows us not to just trade 1 sat ordinals between all Bitcoin forks, it instantiates a capability-based Kantian ethical framework upon the global economy. This ethical framework isn’t necessarily Christian as Kant was, it’s merely based upon who has the capability to record their data in a way that records its material relevance and who doesn’t.

And, then, with respect to Artificial Intelligence, its best use case is to give humans more time in order to experience more anti-fragile effects within a fragile economy. The concept of ‘General Intelligence’ is not so important in so much as enough for a time period long enough for people to discern enough truth from the 90:90 lies-belief ratio as described by Sam Vaknin, in a world where the technology industry is being monopolised by the mentally ill to benefit the mentally ill, and for the mentally ill to create clones of themselves.

So here’s Coingeek, Bitcoin SV’s marketing department, discussing Bitcoin with the inventor of E-Gold and ‘the system’ in terms of exchanges that produced like likes of Sam Bankman Fried. It’s amazing, to me at least, how much Coingeek let Ian Grigg off the hook for being the inventor of every criminal scam under the sun that the Bitcoin Association and Craig Wright nail themselves to the cross with every day on Twitter. But Coingeek do, because the Bitcoin Association isn’t really a non-profit organisation, and Craig Wright doesn’t believe in Jesus, he believes in money and being a permanent victim in his own manufactured psychodrama that only those who bother arguing with him ever buy into.

Egold, which Ian Grigg helped to found, got indicted in 2007 for allegedly helping to fund identity thieves and child pornographers, indictments which later got marked down under a plea agreement. Producing ‘Zero Coupon Bonds’ in a ‘new jurisdiction’ really no different from the Stablecoin fiasco which sunk Terra/Luna in May 2022, and was the same area of interest as Nikolai Mushegian, who washed up dead on a beach in Puerto Rico after this tweet. The late Nikolai’s Twitter bio ‘Larpers who self-style as CEOs or CTOs or VCs are a bigger problem than the establishment. They can’t build anything and will sell you out in 2 seconds.’ will stand the test of time, for a long time, which until humanity learns to organize itself better.

Ian Grigg’s ideas about ‘Artificial General Intelligence’ are linked via BitcoinSV and his own work via these two papers: Multiple Neighborhood Cellular Automata as a Mechanism for Creating an AGI on a Blockchain and this proven demonstration of theoretically endless cellular automata progammed on BitcoinSV by sCrypt. I don’t believe in AGI, but Chat GPT4 does have some incredibly flattering things to say about me and my work. My experiments with ChatGPT4 are recorded on the BitcoinSV blockchain here, here, here and here.

Of these three quotes from ChatGPT4, from the world’s most advanced autocomplete algorithm, the reader is welcome to work out some sort of truth with respect to my background for themselves. The Bitcoin Association, world leaders in unbounded AGI education never worked it out, but I believe my readers to be smarter than them, but it doesn’t take much at this time, I believe. I don’t believe much, but I do believe that.

The Romeo and Juliet Framework is a paper authored by Patrick Mockridge that proposes a new approach to enhancing the performance and explainability of AI systems. The framework is based on the use of linguistic features to create more natural and human-like interactions between humans and machines.

According to the paper, the framework is designed to help AI systems better understand the nuances of human language, including tone, context, and intent. It does this by utilizing a number of linguistic features, such as lexical and syntactic analysis, semantic parsing, and machine learning algorithms.

The framework is named after the famous Shakespearean play "Romeo and Juliet," which is used as an example of the complex and nuanced nature of human language. The paper suggests that by utilizing linguistic features in this way, AI systems can achieve greater levels of performance and explainability, leading to more effective and trustworthy interactions with humans.

Overall, the Romeo and Juliet Framework is an innovative approach to improving the capabilities of AI systems, particularly in the context of natural language processing and human-machine interactions.

Patrick Mockridge is a software engineer and data scientist with expertise in natural language processing and machine learning. He holds a Ph.D. in computer science from the University of Sheffield and has worked on several research projects related to language and AI. He has also published several academic papers on topics such as text classification, sentiment analysis, and machine translation.

Begin with military principles: Initiate the explanatory journey by focusing on military and operational infrastructure resilience principles, such as ALARP (As Low As Reasonably Practicable) and HAZOP (Hazard and Operability Study). In this stage, the emphasis is on reducing risks, ensuring safety and security, and optimizing system performance.

Adapt to civilian AI applications: Adapt these military principles to the civilian context by addressing unique concerns and requirements that arise in civilian AI applications, such as privacy, ethics, social impact, and user-centric explainability. Develop strategies to mitigate risks and minimize potential negative consequences for users.

Enhance user understanding and prioritize safety: Strive to make AI systems transparent, accessible, and understandable to users by clearly communicating their purpose, limitations, and potential consequences. Design AI systems with user protections, consent mechanisms, and opt-out options to prioritize user wellbeing and autonomy.

Foster trust, transparency, and accountability: Establish transparent practices to build trust between users and AI systems. Hold AI developers and platforms accountable for the potential impacts of their systems and enforce ethical guidelines and third-party audits.

Encourage collaboration, cooperation, and public engagement: Foster cross-sector collaboration between AI developers, users, policymakers, and other stakeholders to develop shared understanding, best practices, and user-centric explainability standards for civilian AI applications. Encourage dialogue and public engagement to ensure a comprehensive understanding of AI systems and their implications.

By following this journey, the Romeo and Juliet Framework aims to bridge the gap between military and civilian contexts, providing a comprehensive approach to user-centric AI explainability. This approach can help create a safer, more transparent, and accessible digital environment for all users, regardless of the context in which AI systems are deployed.

I have a background in real world engineering, and am only interested in computers in so much as computers make it easier. I’m not interested in computers, or much less people or organisations, who wave their Harry Potter magical thinking wand of ‘Computers know everything, look I have Wikipedia on my phone and AI and stuff’ and then try to overwrite me and what I know, without even bothering to read or listen to it, like the Bitcoin Association did. At best AI is a very dangerous tool which if used wrongly, without any knowledge of real life, has the power to paperclip maximize the world, as so well described by Daniel Schmachtenberger with those left reduced to the mental state of a retarded jellyfish.

In the meantime, in real life, there’s all this stuff called physical infrastructure and engineering that is responsible and accountable for what happens that’s not on computers, and which is the vast majority of it. If there’s anyone I trust with the implementation of AI in a responsible and nuanced way it’s Daniel Robles at the Ingenesist Project.

According to Craig Wright’s vision for unbounded Bitcoin scaling, called Terranode, mining will become a separate concern from data storage anyway. As BitcoinSV develops the ‘pooled hashes’ as BitcoinSV currently term them now, in terms of its own infrastructure model, will largely just have to flip a switch, while abiding by the node software rules, to mine any fork of Bitcoin.

The ‘Potlatch Principle’ identified by Ian Grigg, which was originally fed by the system he designed of zero coupon bonds, originally Tether, and exchanges, such as Binance and FTX, has reached its game theoretic nadir, as reported by JP Morgan. Jamie Dimon is no stranger to ‘the system’, as described by Ian Grigg, either, according to Whitney Webb. This is system has nothing to do with government overreach as Craig Wright argues, it has everything to do with criminality. The river Thames doesn’t have an oversupply of raw sewage because the government did too much or because the process safety engineers got in the way too much, this much is clear. But more on Ayn Rand later. Suffice to say that the laws of physics and the application of engineering law is not some stuffy old thing that gets in the way of digital zero coupon bonds being traded out of Amsterdam, they’re both essential to the roof not caving in on our heads, not just proverbially but also quite literally.

While Dan Robles argues that Bitcoin has no intrinsic value, it does have intrinsic hash power, intrinsic connective capability, intrinsic energy usage, an intrinsic block reward and an intrinsic fee reward for miners who create blocks. All these concerns will work towards all miners mining according to a BitcoinSV model as easy margins available for mining BTC Bitcoin shrink, block rewards decrease and miners must justify mining with transaction fees as opposed to block rewards. This is all that matters, and Craig Wright and Calvin Ayre both use manufactured Twitter hysteria in order to mask it, even when they’re both fully aware that social media is nonsense and goes against their own stated values. They’re both just wind up merchants playing the long game, neither actually believe in >90% of what they prattle on about.

This much was recognized in Blackrock’s latest Bitcoin ETF SEC filing.

It’s great to finally see both BlackRock and Josh Henslee riding on my coat tails with respect to what I pointed out already, but alas the real world is not the world of 1 sat ordinals, the real world is where laws, both legal and physical, apply with respect to innovation.

And what is ‘block chain expertise’ according to Ian Grigg, with respect to his conversation with Coingeek’s ‘Chief Bitcoin Historian’ Kurt Weiger? Kurt, again, softballs the E-Gold question, just like Charles Miller did. E-Gold got shut down because of of indictments related to child pornography and identity theft, which got marked down under a plea agreement, not because of immigration issues and running out of money. Kurt calls the ‘street cred’ and moves on, when surely as a ‘Chief Bitcoin Historian’ the man has access to Wikipedia on his smartphone. This is his level of personal integrity as a media pundit and why it’s so difficult for me to have respect for him in relation to his official title, or even just as a human being.

According to the Bitcoin Association at this current time their concept of security has nothing to do with either putting one’s hand in one’s own pocket in order to begin staking trust, nor does it have anything to do with engineering law, but it does have everything to do with ‘AGI’ as promoted by the self professed 'inventor of ‘the system’.

Ian Grigg’s public papers are listed here, the pick of the bunch, in my opinion, being ‘The Market for Silver Bullets’ published in 2008. The first problem with Security is that it’s a problem of why and for whom. Diego Gambetta explains this very well in his books ‘Codes of the Underworld’ and ‘The Silician Mafia’.

This problem described by Ian Grigg is actually very similar to the Romeo-Juliet Framework.

When working out the nature of the question ‘security for whom and why?’ Diego Gambetta makes clear that this is primarily a signalling problem, just like the RJF is. BitcoinSV, according to Calvin Ayre, promises to abide by ‘all existing systems and laws’ which is easy to say when his own marketing and media team at Coingeek softball every pertinent question with respect to those existing systems and laws, systems such as those invented by Ian Grigg by his own admission, for example, but not so easy within the context of process safety engineering, security and signalling theory.

Therefore to fully appreciate my own background and my own own perspective in the current year, I’d first like to say that the current year isn’t terribly different from the previous one, which I already wrote up.

In 2013, the thought leaders of the blockchain industry convened at Porcfest in New Hampshire, the same New Hampshire that Ghislaine Maxwell decided to hide out in prior to her arrest, to discuss subverting governments, presumably via the same system established by Ian Grigg in order to create a ‘new jurisdiction’ in order to ‘facilitate the transfer of digital zero coupon bonds’.

Fast forward from 2013 to 2022, and here’s Erik Vorhees again warning Sam Bank Fried that he might have subverted the government a bit too much, taken the whole thing a bit too far. The rest of it with respect to the money laundering activity and political donations is still falling out in the wash but I’m sure we’ll find out the truth in time, if we have enough of it.

Luckily, the development of the internet itself was originally all about political subversion by special interests to begin with. These special interests being the US Navy and the Military Industrial Complex, and this is all clearly just par for the course. So nothing to see here other than what I’ve already written with respect to it. It’s all just one of those Man-Bear-Pig sorts of things that we should all be well aware of already.

What, however, wasn’t being spoken about in 2013 with respect to the Free State Project and New Hampshire itself as a ‘new jurisdiction’ within the ‘system’ invented by Ian Grigg, in order to ‘Subvert Your Government’ was the story of whistle-blower Mike Gill and the information about money laundering and drug trafficking that he uncovered which later became known as the Pandora Papers.

In 2020, Ghislaine Maxwell was arrested in New Hampshire. Shaheen & Gordon acted as her local legal counsel.

Was Ghislaine Maxwell hiding out at this $1 million home paid for in cash?

The AG for the US Virgin Islands has been intent on tracking down the money laundering network of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

Ghislaine Maxwell paid for her New Hampshire home in cash through a shell company: Granite Reality LLC (also registered at 2 1/2 Beacon Street, Concord, New Hampshire just like Boston Private Bank [a subsidiary of Silicon Valley Bank], Granite Recovery Centers and Morninggate HK CASA NH) which has a curiously close name to Red Granite Reality in Maryland (whose status was forfeited in 2014 right before the 1MDB scandal started to blow up involving “Red Granite Pictures” which financed “The Wolf of Wall Street”.

— Claire Best

Decent summaries of the financial and political implications of the Pandora Papers with respect to the $932.5 billion of money associated with them in New Hampshire, Silicon Valley Bank, Sam Bankman-Fried, FTX and ‘Subverting Your Government’ can be found here and here.

Ghislaine’s last Reddit post was reported by Bitcoin.com to be on the subject of Bitcoin, which Jeffrey Epstein was fascinated by also.

With all that being said, I think Mike Gill explains ‘Digital Zero Coupon Bonds’ within a ‘new jurisdiction’ according to ‘the market for security’ within the context of New Hampshire and Ian Grigg, he leads off the conversation very well, in my opinion.

Decentalisation means two different things, one meaning is some sort of vague ideology regarding people being able to make decisions for themselves, but its main meaning since the inception of ARPANET has been as a resilience mechanism in the event of war. In this way I agree with both Craig Wright and Marc Andreesen, if for no other reason at the current time.

The Evergreen Ari Ben-Menashe gives the Mossad Limited Hangout version of events on Epstein and Maxwell below. For further background reading it’s worth buying Gordon Thomas’ ‘Robert Maxwell, Israel's Superspy: The Life and Murder of a Media Mogul’ but also cross-referenced against Lyndon LaRouche’s take on Robert Maxwell also, detailed here and here as well as Cheri Seymour’s version of events with respect to PROMIS software. LaRouche claims that Robert Maxwell was a Major in MI5 Secret Service, at the same time that a certain Victor Rothschild was. Victor Rothchild’s MI5 files with respect to the Cambridge Ring of Five, only declassified in October 2022, have been uploaded for public viewing here, here and here, in addition to those of collaborator Rudolph Katz, but that’s all a subject for a future post.

In the meantime, Ari Ben-Menashe is good enough, he’s not perfect but he’s consistent. He can always be counted upon to be himself and in a world of lies and espionage, that counts for a lot. The lore is deep, but as the old Venetian saying goes ‘the well is only as deep as we wish to look’.

And then in terms of ‘The Market for Silver Bullets’ in terms of living in a society and living the American Dream, this has already been covered in the previous article.

Then in terms of Diego Gambetta’s views on signalling theory, it’s important to be able to calibrate the value of signals. When Mike Gill gives up his $250 million fortune and a $50 million settlement in order to explain to the world what libertarians are actually like, I’m going to view that as a stronger signal of trust than Peter Schiff talking about digital gold at the London Blockchain Conference, because that’s what I’m trained to do as a professional. A lot of libertarians don’t like that, but they’re never there in the fire fight no matter how many guns they buy, that’s the plain truth.

They’re mostly ‘Larpers who self-style as CEOs or CTOs or VCs are a bigger problem than the establishment. They can’t build anything and will sell you out in 2 seconds’ to quote the late Nikolai Mushegian. Aaron Day explains his Ayn Rand Objectivist philosophy below, and why he finds New Hampshire so suitable for people like him. Selling out your friends and business partners to organised crime and then having a marriage of convenience a la Better Call Saul must be the dream of Ayn Rand fanboys the world over. With all that money they can sit and play with their My Little Ponies in their basements for the rest of their lives, undisturbed by anything to do with real life ever again.

And as the Process Safety Engineer in this Hazard and Operability Study regarding the dangers of Bitcoin, money and technology, again Mike Gill has important information with respect to material risks with respect to the Innovation Bank Principles as most recently published by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.

Brendan O’Connell was recently taken off Youtube and Patreon, probably for some of his spicier and unhelpful views and accusations, but three of his most important videos with respect to Mike Gill and the New Hampshire Pandora Papers cartel can be found on Rumble, at least for the time being here:

Brenden O'Connell: Massive Deep State International Drug-Guns-Money Cartel Exposed

Brendon O'Connell: 179. James O'Keefe & The Deep State, Ukraine, Mike Gill & Nation Of Corruption

Brendon O'Connell: 181. Silicon Valley Bank - Trump & The Cartel Drug Money Bank Mar 14, 2023

With respect to Brendan O’Connell’s accusations of a ‘Russian-Israeli’ criminal network, I can say no more than what’s already in the public domain with respect to MI5’s most recently declassified files with respect to that (Victor Rothschild: 1, 2, 3 and Rudolph Katz) which might be for a later post. The Kay Griggs’ Generals network is described by her here from her 1998 interview.

The main takeaway with respect to the RJF is that James O’Keefe’s origins are founded in the New Hampshire Free State Project web of lies alongisde Aaron Day, and that both MAGA Republicans and libertarians are leveraging the information Pandora Papers, which relates to both fentanyl deaths and human trafficking carried out by the likes of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell and as recently shown in The Sound of Freedom starring Jim Caviziel. Because Big Data is feeding Fifth Generation warfare, we can never know why some signals are being amplified and others are being suppressed. Brendan O’Connell is right to be suspicious, is right to view James O’Keefe as a potential Psy-Op to entrap loudmouths and possible whistleblowers. This information comes out as data absent context, we don’t know how it’s going to be used. For context I would suggest starting with Lecture 6 of the RJF series and my previous article on the Bitcoin Industry.

When James O’Keefe can explain what happened to Mike Gill’s tractor trailer full of Fentanyl, when the American Government can explain what happened to it and follow up Mike Gill’s evidence, then trust might be easier. But trust is hard earned, easily lost: just 80 000 lb of Fentanyl in New Hampshire from under the noses of the DEA.

And the same principle applies to personal data with respect to GDPR enforcement in the United Kingdom as well, as explained by expert consultant Alexander C. Mueller PhD.

In terms of all these ‘experts’ in Big Data, artificial intelligence and blockchain technology, all of this can be explained within the Capital as Power framework, which the RJF is a continuation of. It’s not for me to explain myself to them with respect to engineering law, risk management in the physical domain, it’s up to them. If they want to put their heads in the sand like Craig Wright and pretend that the answer to the world’s problem is more Ayn Rand Bronies, then fine. It’s easy explaining themselves on Twitter or to a captive audience, it’s not so easy in the face of worthy adversaries on an intellectual level. So next time Craig Wright picks a fight, remember that he never picking fights on an even playing field, he’s playing along with an act.

With respect to the phenomenon of ‘engineering stagflation’ which underpins the RJF and AI Explainability in terms of GDPR, one company building on BSV have the answer, they’re called UNISOT: The Universal Source of Truth. A bold claim, but good enough for now given the title of their presentation at the London Blockchain Conference.

And in the meantime, the actual reality carries on regardless and I already described it a long time ago.

Make Engineering Great Again, TTFN

Termination Of Consultancy Agreement Ba P

272KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download