The Teleoplexic Attractor

Engineering Irresistible Revolution

An experiment in Quantum Romeo-Juliet Framework mathematics using the cybernetically formulated construct of the ‘Totemic Phallus’ as a teleoplexic attractor for female libidinal desire and the female orgasm, synethesizing Sadie Plant as well as Mark Fisher and Nick Land from the previous post. continuing from yesterday’s NSFW prompt vector space hacking. Created with Deepseek.

In the quantum economic model, reality exists in a superposition of states until measured. The totemic penis is a strategic intervention at the level of both the state vector and the measurement apparatus itself.

1. State Preparation: Engineering the Superposition

Before the attractor’s introduction, the “female desire/innovation” state vector

\(|\psi_{\text{desire}}\rangle\)

is typically weakly defined and prone to collapse into predefined, patriarchal eigenstates e.g.,

\(|M_{\text{commodity}}\rangle\)

\(|M_{\text{submission}}\rangle\)

The ritual preparation—the council’s historical framing, the physical training—is the application of a preparation Hamiltonian

\(Ĥ_{\text{prep}}\)

that actively constructs a robust, high-amplitude superposition:

\( |\psi_{\text{desire}}\rangle_{\text{prepared}} = \alpha|{\text{sovereign pleasure}}\rangle + \beta|{\text{political integration}}\rangle + \gamma|{\text{systemic rewrite}}\rangle\)

This process maximizes the coefficients

\(\alpha, \beta, \gamma\)

for the desired revolutionary outcomes, making the system less susceptible to collapse into old patterns. This is the “debugging of patriarchal code” at the neurological level.

2. The Attractor as a Biased Measurement Operator

The paper describes the market operator

\(Ô_{\text{market}} = \sumₖ \lambdaₖ |Mₖ\rangle\langle Mₖ| \)

which has eigenstates biased toward capital. The totemic penis is a competing, feminist measurement operator

\(Ô_{\text{attractor}}\)

• Eigenstate Engineering: Its physical specification (large, foreign) is not arbitrary. It defines a new set of non-patriarchal eigenstates

  \(|Aₖ\rangle\)

• such as

  \(|{\text{recalibrated capacity}}\rangle \)

• or

  \(|{\text{inverted symbolism}}\rangle\)

• Collapse Guidance: When the “measurement” event occurs (the sexual act), the collapse probability is given by the Born rule, but now there are competing operators. The goal is to make the system’s interaction with

  \(Ô_{\text{attractor}}\)

• so strong that it overwhelms the biased measurement of the patriarchal economic system.

The probability of collapsing to a sovereign state becomes:

\(P(\text{collapse} \rightarrow |Aₖ\rangle) = |\langle Aₖ|\psi_{\text{desire}}\rangle_{\text{prepared}}|²\)

The preparation rituals ensure this probability is high.

3. Overcoming Decoherence and the “Deathly Embrace”

The paper’s “deathly embrace” is analogous to quantum decoherence. The revolutionary state

\(|\psi_{\text{desire}}\rangle\)

is fragile and easily loses its coherence (its revolutionary potential) by becoming entangled with the environment of patriarchal capital

\(\rho_{\text{environment}}\)

The totemic penis acts as a decoherence suppression mechanism. Its precise, ritualized use creates a “protected subspace” or a “quantum error-correcting code” for desire. It prevents the state from being corrupted by environmental noise (internalized shame, capitalist realism), allowing the “quantum information” of genuine liberation to be preserved and actualized.

4. Teleoplexy as Non-Markovian Evolution

Sadie Plant’s and Nick Land’s concept of teleoplexy—where a system manufactures the conditions of its own success—maps directly to the paper’s non-Markovian deep game:

\( |\Psi(t)\rangle = 𝓣 \exp(-i\int Ĥ_{\text{strategic}} dt) |\Psi₀\rangle + \intₜ₀ᵗ K(t,\tau)|\Psi(\tau)\rangle dτ\)

The “memory kernel”

\(K(t, \tau)\)

here is the historical and symbolic weight of the phallus. The attractor doesn’t just create a new future; it actively re-writes the past

\(\tau\)

by recontextualizing the symbol, changing the entire trajectory of the state evolution

\(|\Psi(t)\rangle\)

The system becomes “irresistible” because the act of choosing the totemic penis feels like discovering a pre-existing truth, not obeying an external command. This is the “zero free action” or logical consistency of a boundary merger between the individual’s desire and the collective revolutionary goal.

5. The Cyberfeminist “Zero Free Action”

The ultimate collapse, the catalytic female orgasm, represents the moment of zero free action in economic space:

\(A·A^\dagger = 0 \Leftrightarrow \langle B_{\text{oscar}}|Ĥ_{\text{merge}}|B_{\text{mallory}}\rangle = 0\)

• In this context:

  \(B_{\text{oscar}} \)

  is the individual’s prepared neural architecture.

  \(B_{\text{mallory}} \)

  is the teleoplexic attractor (the totemic penis).

• The “merge Hamiltonian”

  \(Ĥ_{\text{merge}} \)

  • is the protocol of the sexual act itself.

When the “merge” is perfectly executed, there is no “action” or friction—the revolutionary potential is actualized seamlessly. The orgasm is the physical proof of this successful merger, a synchronization pulse that aligns the individual’s liberated state with the distributed nodes of the revolutionary Chimera network.

Core Theoretical Synthesis

Landian Teleoplexity

The totemic penis functions as a self-optimizing attractor that doesn’t persuade through argument but through creating experiential conditions that feel like discovered truth. The system manufactures its own success by engineering environments where revolutionary consciousness emerges as the path of least psychological resistance.

Fisherian Breakthrough

Moving “beyond capitalist realism” requires not just critique but material demonstration that alternatives exist and function. The totemic penis serves as physical proof that the old system’s logic can be inverted—that what once signified domination can become an interface for coordination.

Plantian Execution

Technology’s inherently feminine-coded structure (decentralized, emergent, connective) means the revolution isn’t imposed from outside but activated from within existing systems. The digital “loom” was always already feminine; patriarchy merely occupied it temporarily.

The Correlation Mechanism

The totemic penis correlates with female orgasm through three simultaneous operations:

1. Semiotic Inversion: Takes patriarchy’s most potent symbol and repurposes it as emblem of female sovereignty

2. Physiological Recalibration: Systematically expands the body’s processing capacity through ritual preparation

3. Network Integration: Transforms individual climax into synchronization pulse for distributed revolutionary infrastructure

For Elena specifically, the teleoplexic irresistibility operates by bypassing intellectual resistance and executing protocol directly on the nervous system—her body “signs a treaty the mind has not yet ratified.”

The Ultimate Significance: This isn’t pornography or simple role reversal, but political engineering where bodily sensation becomes the medium for rewriting social operating systems. The “failure” to map this cleanly into computational space is itself the proof that genuine revolutionary transformation exceeds current paradigmatic constraints.

Explainer Table (NSFW)

Until next time, TTFN.